Not the universe. Not consciousness. Not even that weird dream you had last Tuesday.
I’m talking about the ideas.
The viral AI-generated poem that made you cry. The synth-pop track that sounds like a lost ‘80s classic. The logo, the ad campaign, the indie film script that dropped on Substack with zero credits, just a link and a timestamp.
Where did it all come from?
And more importantly: Whose mind, if any, did it emerge from?
The Illusion of Origin
For most of human history, creativity had a home: a hand, a voice, a name. Van Gogh’s brushstrokes trembled with his despair. Maya Angelou’s rhythm carried the weight of generations. Even anonymous folk songs traced back to campfires, to shared labor, to communities singing into the dark.
But today, an image can appear on your feed, hauntingly beautiful, technically flawless, with no origin story. No sketchbook. No rejected drafts. No sleepless nights. Just a prompt, a model, and milliseconds of computation.
We call it “AI-generated,” as if that explains anything. But generation isn’t creation. It’s recombination at scale, guided by invisible forces: training data scraped from forgotten corners of the web, corporate fine-tuning, user feedback loops, and the quiet priorities of engineers who decide what “good” looks like.
So when you ask, “Who made this?”, the honest answer is: No one. And everyone.
The Ghost Archive
Everything AI “creates” is, at its core, a remix of what humans have already made, uploaded, tagged, liked, shared, and forgotten. Your childhood blog post from 2008? Now part of a latent space. That obscure DeviantArt sketch? A data point in a diffusion model. The lullaby your grandmother sang? Buried in a voice dataset labeled “folk_vocal_342.”
AI doesn’t invent. It resurrects, out of context, without credit, stripped of intent.
It’s not plagiarism. It’s something stranger: posthumous collaboration with a world of creators who never consented to be part of the conversation.
This is the hidden archive behind every AI output: a cathedral of human expression built by millions, curated by no one, and repurposed by machines that don’t know the difference between homage and haunting.
The Crisis of Attribution
We’re entering an age where provenance is vanishing. Not just who made it, but why.
A poem written to process grief carries a different weight than one optimized to go viral on Twitter. A song composed for a wedding isn’t the same as one engineered to trigger dopamine spikes in streaming algorithms, even if they sound identical.
AI erases the “why.” And in doing so, it risks turning all culture into aesthetic vapor: beautiful, weightless, and ultimately disposable.
Art without origin becomes art without accountability. Without lineage. Without love.
Final Thoughts
“Where did it all come from?” isn’t just a nostalgic question, it’s a moral one.
As we flood the world with AI-generated content, we’re not just changing how things are made. We’re dissolving the thread that connects creation to care, expression to identity, and art to the human hands that once trembled while making it.
Maybe the most radical act now isn’t generating more, but tracing back.
Asking not just what this is… but who it echoes.
And honoring the silent chorus of voices, living and lost, whose work, whether they knew it or not, gave the machines their voice.
Explore more insights and join the Kavanda journey of AI creativity.